Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:59
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Why would an older small breed dog become obsessive about hygiene?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Cole? Kyle? Whatever the name, M's thrilled to see Young arrive in majors - The Seattle Times
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Have you ever secretly watched someone while they were doing something private?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How can small businesses benefit from using business networking platforms?